Legal Opinion

South Side Irrigation Co. v. Brooks

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917No. 19787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dawson county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.

The defendant, “for the consideration of a perpetual water right” to certain land, gave to the plaintiff the right to construct its irrigation canal over the land. Defendant has never exercised his right to the use of water provided for, and has refused to pay a maintenance fee of one dollar an acre, alleged to be the usual charge therefor. Plaintiff’s action to recover the amount of the maintenance fee was dismissed by the trial court. Plaintiff appeals.

No water-right deed, providing for a maintenance fee, was made. It appears that before the contract was signed maintenance fee charges were…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. BashorIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Laier v. South Side Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API