Legal Opinion

Benchoff v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 18, 1990No. 1512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Ronald F. Benchoff instituted this action against Mark Anthony Morgan and Otto J. Morgan seeking damages for injuries incurred when he was struck by an automobile driven by Mark Anthony Morgan. The trial judge granted Otto J. Morgan’s motion for a nonsuit with prejudice on the ground that family purpose had not been established. The case proceeded before the jury which returned a verdict in favor of Mark Anthony Morgan. Benchoff appeals the denial of his various motions and the grant of Otto Morgan’s motion for nonsuit with prejudice. We affirm.

On June 23,1984, Benchoff, while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Watson v. SellersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Porter v. CookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  5. MacK v. RileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Ex Parte Dept. of Health & Env. ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Bennett v. Wilbro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API