People v. Secrest
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of first-degree murder contrary to MCL 750.316; MSA 28.548, assault with intent to commit murder contrary to MCL 750.83; MSA 28.278, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony contrary to MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2). Thereafter, defense counsel moved for a new trial on the theory that the seizure of two photographs of defendant which were admitted into evidence at trial was in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. The motion was granted. The trial court denied the prosecution’s motion for reconsideration. From this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SecrestMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. WestMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WestMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982