Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wegley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanaugh, J.

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from a pre-trial order which dismissed the charge of escape filed against appellee when he violated the terms of his intermediate punishment by leaving his residence and cutting an electronic monitoring device from his leg. The issue presented is whether appellee was subject to official detention, within the terms of the escape statute, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5121, at the time of his alleged actions. We conclude that the conditions to which appellee was subject, ie., house arrest and electronic monitoring, constitute official detention within the meaning of the offense of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. ChiappiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. ShartleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. State v. ClayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Moore v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Moore v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Raymond Brown v. Marco Ortiz, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API