Legal Opinion
State v. Starks
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 7, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TATUM, Judge.
The defendant, Donald Starks, entered a plea of guilty to the felonious possession of a Schedule VI controlled substance and was sentenced to not less than 2 years nor more than 4 years in the State penitentiary, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. He preserved his right to appeal from an adverse ruling on a motion to suppress pursuant to T.R.Cr.P. 37(b). The motion to suppress attacked the validity and execution of the search warrant. We find no merit in the issues presented and affirm the judgment below.
The defendant says that the affidavit for the search warrant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SetzlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. CurtisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- State v. McAloonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986