Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Piedmont Municipal Power Agency

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1982No. 21640Published

1DissentLittlejohn, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the Order of the Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Johnson and Jones are property owners, citizens, residents, and consumers of electricity in the cities of New-berry and Gaffney, respectively. The action is brought individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated pursuant to the authorization of § 15-5-50, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended.

The defendants are PMPA, a joint collection of various municipalities as authorized under the Act, and the mayor and members of the city councils of Newberry and Gaffney. While Newberry and Gaffney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Greenville Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Gilbert v. BathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Robinson v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Dunn Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API