S.A.V. v. K.G.V.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RENDLEN, Judge.. This appeal concerns Missouri’s longstanding rule of interspousal immunity for tort actions, discussed at length in Townsend v. Townsend, 708 S.W.2d 646 (1986). This case differs from Townsend in that appellant charges her husband with negligence as well as an intentional tort. We now decide if spousal immunity should continue as a bar to negligence actions or whether it too should be removed as we have done for the intentional tort in Townsend. For reasons hereinafter discussed we hold that the archaic doctrine of spousal immunity is no longer available as a bar to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Brown v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- B.N. v. K.KCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Price v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.