Hurley v. Inhabitants of Trenton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fort, J.
The prosecutor, a resident and taxpayer of the city of Trenton, seeks, by this writ, to set aside a certain contract of the city council of the city of Trenton, awarded to the Barber Asphalt Paving Company, to repave Bank and East Hanover streets, in said city.
*539The first reason assigned is that no fund exists out of -which to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the contract.
The folloAving agreed fact appears in the record:
“It is further admitted by the counsel for the defendants that, at the time of the making of the contract mentioned in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ottawa v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Empire Voting Mach. Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Columbus Street Railway & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Humacao Lumber Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
- Moscoso Hno. & Cía. v. Municipio de JayuyaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.