Legal Opinion
Brown-Pacific Maxon Co. v. Cardillo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1950No. Civ. 53-394PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek to set aside, as not in accordance with law, a compensation order made by defendant deputy commissioner under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. The order directs plaintiffs to make specified payments to Ernestine Jacobs as compensation for the disability and death of her husband, Homer V. Jacobs. Jurisdiction is predicated on 33 U. S.C.A. § 921(b). Plaintiffs and defendants have severally moved for summary judgment.
The facts material to this proceeding, as found by the deputy commissioner, are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Grain Handling Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- International Mercantile Marine Co. v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Hitt v. CardilloDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
- Southern S. S. Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Insurance Fund and Guardino & Sons v. Catherine Pesce and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- John W. McGrath Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.