Boehm v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Michael B. Boehm appeals the Commissioner’s denial of disability and supplemental security income benefits, claiming an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) incorrectly evaluated the medical source evidence, wrongly discredited his testimony, and inaccurately presented his limitations to a vocational expert (“VE”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and affirm.
I
Mr. Boehm was injured in a logging accident and then again while lifting a beam at work. Various diagnostic tests and physicians confirmed that Mr. Boehm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Keyes-Zachary v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Qualls v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.