Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2013No. 12-5102Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Michael B. Boehm appeals the Commissioner’s denial of disability and supplemental security income benefits, claiming an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) incorrectly evaluated the medical source evidence, wrongly discredited his testimony, and inaccurately presented his limitations to a vocational expert (“VE”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and affirm.

I

Mr. Boehm was injured in a logging accident and then again while lifting a beam at work. Various diagnostic tests and physicians confirmed that Mr. Boehm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Keyes-Zachary v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Qualls v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API