Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JUSTICE POWELL concurring 1 in part and dissenting in part.
Although I agree with the majority that general district courts, as courts not of record, do not have the subject matter jurisdiction to try title to real property, I cannot agree with the majority's reasoning that questions concerning title are the equivalent of trying title. In my opinion, there is a significant difference between an action that turns on the question of title and an action that tries title. The former is merely an evidentiary question, whereas the latter involves a conclusive determination of a party's claim of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Addison v. SalyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Patterson v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- OA PATTERSON v. Rosetta AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- State of Maine v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.