Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 16, 2016No. Record 150454Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUSTICE POWELL concurring 1 in part and dissenting in part.

Although I agree with the majority that general district courts, as courts not of record, do not have the subject matter jurisdiction to try title to real property, I cannot agree with the majority's reasoning that questions concerning title are the equivalent of trying title. In my opinion, there is a significant difference between an action that turns on the question of title and an action that tries title. The former is merely an evidentiary question, whereas the latter involves a conclusive determination of a party's claim of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Addison v. SalyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Patterson v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. OA PATTERSON v. Rosetta AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. State of Maine v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API