Legal Opinion

Lee County v. Eaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 21, 1994No. 94-00886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Lee County has filed a petition for certio-rari, which we elect to treat as a motion to review a cost order. See Fla.RApp.P. 9.400(c). We reverse the order to the extent that it requires Lee County, a nonparty to this civil action, to pay for an appellate transcript. The fact that the successful appellant may be indigent is not a basis to require a county to pay for a transcript in an ordinary civil action.

Sandra Eaton sued Peter A. Gurry for monetary damages in the circuit court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit. The action alleged that Ms. Eaton was entitled to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shuman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Smith v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Eaton v. GurryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. BamashDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API