Legal Opinion

Alston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1996No. 95-1777Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Timothy Alston (“Alston”), appeals his sentence as a habitual offender. We reverse.

After a jury found Alston guilty of arson, the State filed its notice to seek an enhanced habitual offender sentence. At the sentencing hearing, Alston objected to an enhanced sentence, arguing that he did not meet the statutory criteria. At this hearing, the trial court allowed the State a continuance to further research the issue.

When the hearing resumed, the State argued for enhancement because Alston was convicted of a cocaine charge in 1992, less than five years before this conviction.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Laster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API