Legal Opinion

Kuzo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Sheila Kuzo (Claimant) petitions for review of the May 14, 2007, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) granting the Petition for Physical Examination (Petition) filed by St. Luke’s Miner’s Memorial Med Center (Employer) and directing Claimant to attend and submit to a physical examination for purposes of an impairment rating evaluation (IRE) pursuant to sections 306(a.2)(6) and 314 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We quash Claimant’s petition for review.

Claimant sustained a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Groller v. WCABSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Groller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. P. Watson v. WCAB (Hillsberg)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. T. Cantanese v. WCAB (RTA Services Co., Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. T. Dolquist v. WCAB (City of New Castle)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API