Legal Opinion

Reed v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 27, 1980No. CA 80-154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Judge.

Before üs is the question of whether the trial court properly granted a motion for summary judgment to the.buyer in an action by the seller to recover the purchase price of land. We have come to the conclusion, with some difficulty, that.the court erred in'ruling as a matter of law that the seller could not recover under the contract. -

In reviewing the propriety of granting summary judgment, we must view the allegations of the complaint and the plaintiffs affidavit in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, resolving all doubts and inferences in his favor. Deltic Farm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Schnitt v. McKellarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Russell v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Wirges v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company. s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. S.O.G.-San Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Vogelgesang v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Vogelgesang v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API