Legal Opinion

In re Adoption Fern

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 21, 2018No. 17–P–1077Published

1Opinion of the Court

A judge of the Juvenile Court terminated the father's parental rights to the child and declined to order posttermination and postadoption visitation. The father does not appeal from the termination of his parental rights but argues, for the first time on appeal, that the judge abused her discretion in declining to order posttermination and postadoption visitation.3 Even assuming this issue is properly before us, it fails on the merits.

A judge has the discretion to order posttermination and postadoption visitation when it is in the child's best interests. See Adoption of Douglas, 473 Mass.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adoption of IlonaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Adoption of VitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Adoption of DouglasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API