Goodwin v. Buelduc
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Goodwin v. Buelduc & a. Trespass quare clausum. Trial by a referee, who found for the plaintiff and reported the facts. Both parties claim title to the locus, which is a part of the northerly half of Lot 66, Range 2, in New Durham. Further facts appear in the opinion. Transferred without ruling from the September term, 1909, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
The defendants seek to set aside the report of the referee upon the ground that there is nothing to support the finding that John E. Goodwin owned the disputed territory'in 1867, and for error in the construction given by the referee to John’s deed to Elisha Goodwin. Both parties claimed that Lot 66 had been divided, but they differed as to the location of the division line. The plaintiff claimed a division of the lot in equal parts, and the defendants one which would include over three fourths of the area in the southerly “ half.”
There was evidence from which it could be found that John E.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maxfield v. White River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907