Legal Opinion

Whigham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1926No. 1 Div. 677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Section 4657 of the Code of 1923 provides that the unexplained possession of any part or parts of any still, or any device or substitute therefor, commonly, ot generally used for, or that is suitable to be used in, the manufacture of prohibited liquors and beverages, shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of the preceding section (4656). The evidence for the state tended toi prove that the “lard can” and cap found in' defendant’s possession were commonly used for the purposes denounced by the statute. If the jury believed the state’s evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, they could from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Harvey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Watson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Bowden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Bolin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Bolin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API