Legal Opinion

Honig v. Riley

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The facts, and the statutory law invoked by the defendant, are sufficiently stated by Mr. Justice Spiegelbekg, in his opinion in the court below (reported in 124 Misc. 809). I am not prepared to express any general opinion in respect of the legislative intent that governed the making of this remarkable statute (General Business Law, § 201, as added by Laws of 1924, chap. 506),* and I believe we should confine ourselves sharply to a decision upon the precise situation now before us. I agree with the learned trial justice that it is not conceivable that the Legislature intended that no matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Honig v. RileyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API