Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Cooper
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 19, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:91-3436-18PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Kevin and Toni Schumacher, bring this admiralty action, pursuant to Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Kevin Schumacher, while attending a 4th of July celebration on Lake Marion, was struck and injured by a pontoon boat owned and being operated by Defendant, James D. Cooper, III. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant was negligent and reckless in the operation of his boat and that he violated the Inland Rules of Navigation.
This case was tried before this Tribunal, sitting without a jury, on December 13 and 14, 1993.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Matthews v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Boan v. BlackwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Friedman v. Cunard Line Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Bodnar v. Hi-Lex Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.