ACS of Anchorage, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Petitioner ACS of Anchorage, Inc. challenges a Federal Communications Commission order finding that ACS exceeded its permissible rate of return for 1997-98. As a remedy, the Commission ordered ACS to pay damages plus prejudgment interest to a complaining customer, General Communications, Inc. (“GCI”). See In re General Communication, Inc. v. Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 01-32, at 2, ¶ 1 (Jan. 24, 2001) (“Order”); id. at 31, ¶ 77.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Pacific Bell, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- H. P. Coffee Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- New York v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Rural Cellular Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Hagelin v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Competitive Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- BP Energy Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.