Below v. Norton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 45. (dissenting). This is a case that can affect every single person who purchases a home in Wisconsin. For many citizens of this state, buying a home will be one of the most important purchases that they will make in their lifetime.
¶ 46. According to the majority, a person selling a home can look the buyer in the eye, lie about the condition of the home, and escape legal consequences in tort for the lie because of the economic loss doctrine.
¶ 47. Wisconsin has the dubious distinction of being the only state in the entire country to have expanded this judicially created doctrine in such a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas CostarricensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.