Legal Opinion

Wingate v. Hamilton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Bill in chancery, under the old practice, for the specific performance of the condition of a bond reading as follows:

*74« Know all men that I, William R. Hamilton, of the county of Peoria, state of Illinois, do hereby bind myself, my heirs, &c., to make unto Robert M. Wingate, of Clay county, Indiana, a good and sufficient warranty deed to the following lots in Bowling- Green, Clay county, Indiana, viz.: Out-lots numbers one and twenty-seven, on the plat of said town. Also, lots numbers eight, and three, and four, in block number six; and lot number five in block number three.

“ Now, the above…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bandy v. MYERSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Foster v. KlingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Hazelrig v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Aiple-Hemmelmann Real Estate Co. v. SpelbrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API