Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Czumaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 2004Published

1Dissent

Green and Scudder, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. We disagree with the majority that the demand for arbitration by Federal Express mail is jurisdictionally defective because it is not one of the permitted methods of service set forth in CPLR 7503 (c), i.e., “in the same manner as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.” In our view, the procedure used herein is analogous to personal service by mail as provided for in CPLR 312-a. Furthermore, such service is the functional equivalent of registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, inasmuch…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Arbitration between Andy Floors, Inc. & Tyler Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Secreto v. International Business Machines Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API