Peters v. George
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States lor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called the “defendants,” were the owners of a slate quarry near the town of Slatington, m Pennsylvania, and the defendant in error, hereinafter called “the plaintiff,” was employed by them as a laborer in said quarry. The plaintiff, a Syrian and a subject of the Sultan of Turkey, brought suit in the Circuit Court of the United State;; against the defendants for compensation for bodily injuries suffered by him while working in defendants’ quarries, and which he alleges were due to the negligence of the defendants. At the trial, the case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- The State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Illinois Cent. R. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Lucey v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Tweeten v. Tacoma Ry. & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.