Hodges v. Fitle
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DENNEY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the hearing for the issuance of a temporary injunction. The Court, on its own motion has raised the issue of subject-matter jurisdiction based upon the fact that this case involves no substantial federal question. Dismissal for lack of a substantial federal question is entirely proper. Williams v. Miller, 48 F.Supp. 277 [N.D.Cal.1942], affirmed, 317 U.S. 599, 63 S.Ct. 258, 87 L.Ed. 489. See Money v. Swank, 432 F.2d 1140 [7th Cir. 1970].
The jurisdictional problem here presented necessarily involves a discussion of the legal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salem v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Major Liquors, Inc. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Misurelli v. City of RacineDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- Hughes v. CristofaneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Paladino v. City of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.