Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DeGennaro

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 21, 2013No. Nos. 11-P-1398 & 11-P-1383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.

This appeal requires interpretation of a seldom litigated criminal statute. The defendant, building contractor Peter DeGennaro, engaged through various business entities in the construction and improvement of residential homes. The co-defendant, Charlene Connors, participated in the operations of the entities. At the conclusion of a five-day trial, a Superior Court jury convicted each defendant of five counts of embezzlement of funds deposited with them by two customers. In accordance with purchase and sale agreements presented by the defendants for the construction of homes, the customers…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. ZanettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Broomfield v. KosowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Warsofsky v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DegennaroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. HraizMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  3. DeGennaro v. DolanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API