Legal Opinion

Chicago Attachment Co. v. Davis Sewing Machine Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Hollín S. Williamson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

April 28, 1882, the appellee demised to Walter Scates and John M. Greist certain premises for a term of five years ending April 30, 1887. Scates and Greist used the name of “ Chicago Attachment Company,” as well as their own, in conducting their business of manufacturing sewing machine attachments. February 9, 1883, by a bill of sale, Greist sold all his interest in the property of the “Chicago Attachment Company and Scates & Greist,” to Thomas S. Ridgway. In March, 1883, Scates demised a part of the premises, by a lease to which he signed the name of Ridgway as well as his own. In July,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webster v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Sanders v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Carter & Carter v. Hammett & BalchNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Carter v. HammettNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Babcock v. ScovilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chilson v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Dyer Bros. Golden West Iron Works v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Miller v. HawesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Prante v. HartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API