Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Wells

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 6, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill in Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.

It appears from the pleadings that Jacob D. Babcock, deceased, left three children, John J. Babcock, Harriet E. B. Cundall, and Sarah A. Humphrey, who became tenants in common of the property involved in this suit, and so occupied it up to January 30, 1877.

At that date a suit for partition, brought by Mrs. Humphrey, was pending.

It is claimed that she was indebted to her brother and sister for repairs and other expenses, on account of which she agreed to transfer her third to them for the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, said suit to be discontinued without costs; that Babcock applied to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Smith v. McClainIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rippetoe v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Stark v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Hallenbeck v. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Shappy v. Downcity Capital Partners, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. McDougall v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wood v. City of East ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  5. Sullenger v. BaecherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API