Legal Opinion

In re George Parsons 1907 Trust

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 5, 2017No. Docket: Cum-15-272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, and HUMPHREY, JJ.

Dissent: HJELM and JABAR, JJ.

SAUFLEY, C.J.

[¶ 1] Thomas Maxwell appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Cumberland County Probate Court (Mazziotti, J.) in favor of David Gourevitch, a qualified beneficiary of the George Parsons 1907 Trust, on his complaint for a declaratory judgment that Maxwell is not a beneficiary of the Trust. Because we agree with Maxwell that the undisputed facts establish that Gourevitch’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations, we vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] The summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tibble v. Edison Int'lSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Renz v. BeemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Nevin v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pilot Point, LLC v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  2. Mark W. Ogden v. Joedy LabonvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Estate of Marion Sprague v. Bankers Life and Casualty CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  4. In re George Parsons 1907 TrustSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. WYMAN v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API