Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Athletic Co. v. KQV Broadcasting Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1938No. 3415PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action in equity in which plaintiffs ask for a preliminary injunction to restrain defendant from broadcasting play-by-play reports and descriptions of baseball games played by the “Pirates,” a professional baseball team owned by Pittsburgh Athletic Company, both at its home baseball park in Pittsburgh, known as “Forbes Field,” and at baseball parks in other cities.

The plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction pendente lite. This motion was heard on the bill of complaint, injunction affidavits, and counter-affidavits.

The bill of complaint-was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dior v. MiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ninth Inning, Inc. v. Directv, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API