Legal Opinion
Rafael Sandoval v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 2015No. 13-15250UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum filed on February 17, 2015, is hereby amended. An amended memorandum is filed concurrently -with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM **
The County of Sonoma, the Sonoma…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frederick Jackson v. Michael BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bini v. City of VancouverDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Smith v. Pierce CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- A.J.B., et al. v. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Sterling v. AntiochDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- VW CREDIT LEASING LTD v. The City of San MateoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023