Legal Opinion

King v. Franco

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1983No. 46058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The Director of Revenue appeals from a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission that the taxpayer, Franco, was entitled to a refund of use tax paid. We reverse.

The facts were stipulated. In March 1977, Franco executed a lease agreement with Allstate Leasing for rental of a Cadillac Seville. The rental agreement was executed in Maryland. In addition to his $311 monthly rental Franco agreed to pay Allstate $12 monthly for sales and use taxes. The agreement was for 36 months and provided that after that term Franco could terminate the lease by returning the vehicle at which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. LAWYERS'ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. King v. L & L Marine Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. National Dairy Products Corporation v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spudich v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Missouri Public Service Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Spudich v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API