Legal Opinion

Drown v. Hebert (In Re Drown)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 3, 2006No. 19-10032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The matter before the Court is the Objection filed by Karl S. Drown (“Drown” or the “Debtor”) to a proof of claim filed in his Chapter 13 case. Raymond Hebert (“Hebert”) timely filed the proof of claim in which he represented that the Debtor owes him the sum of $258,750 stemming from a failed development of property known as Lot 1, Smith Street, Dighton, Massachusetts (the “Smith Street property”). Hebert attached to his proof of claim a document captioned, “Hebert vs. Drown,” in which he listed various costs and expected fees…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Fox v. F & J Gattozzi Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weber v. SanbornDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API