Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Fung Chong Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 9, 1946No. 4524Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bland, Judge:

The instant merchandise, dried sweet or candied kumquats in jars, has been classified by the trial court under paragraph 743 as oranges at 1 cent per pound. (Candied fruits are provided for ad valorem.)

The trial court had held in Quong Lee & Company et al. v. United States, 10 Cust. Ct. 23, C. D. 716, that such merchandise was within the common meaning of the term “ oranges,” no question of commercial designation having been decided. In the instant case the Government sought to prove and, I think, did prove that kumquats such as those at bar were not oranges in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API