Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Fritz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1983No. 83-35PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, Nathan U. Firestone and Mildred Firestone, appeal from a judgment which dismissed their complaint which sought damages because of water overflow from the adjoining property of defendant Frank J. Fritz. They appeal also from a judgment which dismissed their suit against the city of Highland Park and its agents for issuing a building permit for a structure which allegedly contributed to the injury.

I

The complaint against the adjoining property owners alleged, in substance, that Fritz had erected a corregated retaining…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. West American Insurance v. Sal E. Lobianco & Son Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Parkway Bank & Trust v. City of DarienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Glover v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. Darien Park Dist.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Layne v. Builders Plumbing Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Meyers v. KissnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zimmer v. Village of WillowbrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Rozsavolgyi v. The City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API