Legal Opinion

Field v. Giegengack

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 5, 1934No. 6223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HiTZ, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court of the District overruling a demurrer to the answer of the public printer to a petition for a writ of mandamus.

The writ is sought to require the public printer to grant certain leave to an employee o£ the Government Printing Office, where the petitioner is a proofreader and the respondent, as public printer of the United States, is the administrator. The petitioner contends that the public printer denies Mm certain leave to which ho is lawfully entitled but which is refused under the supposed authority of the Economy…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caswell v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Kohlman v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Lincoln v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API