Hallidie v. Sutter Street Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
Action to recover three thousand eight hundred and eight dollars for eleven thousand four hundred feet of three-inch flexible steel rope, which the plaintiff claims to have sold and delivered to the defendant at its special instance and request. By the answer defendant denied a sale, and affirmed that the rope was made under a contract by which the plaintiff agreed, for a stipulated price, to manufacture in the best manner aud of the best quality of steel wire, a steel rope or cable, which would be in all respects suitable for operating and running the cars of the Sutter Street Railroad up…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Todd v. Dowd's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Hight v. RipleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
- Fickett v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Gilfallan v. GilfallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Silsby Manuf'g Co. v. Town of ChicoUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
- McCartney v. BadovinacSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Wilbur v. BinghamCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.