Legal Opinion
Hignite v. Nantz
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 11, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Perry
Affirming.
In May, 1932, the appellant, J. L. Hignite, filed suit in the Jackson circuit court against J. M. Hignite and J. C. Nantz as partners, operating under the business name of Hignite & Nantz, upon the following note:
“McKee, Ky. Dec. 29-1923.
“Three months after date we or either of us promise to pay to J. L. Hignite or order the sum of Fourteen Hundrey Seventy One Dollars and eighty five cents [$1,471.85] for value received of him in Gren. Mdse, with Int. 8% from date until paid.
*Hignite.& Nantz.”
The plaintiff by his petition alleged that the note was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Colker v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Mattingly v. ShortellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Merrit v. PollysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyle v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ellis v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
- Ratliff v. LineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
- Holladay v. HolladayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943