Legal Opinion

Sherlock v. Fontainebleau

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 18, 2017No. CASE NO: 15-CIV-24593 LENARD/GOODMAN, CASE NO: 16-CIV-20924-MARTINEZ/GOODMANPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CONCERNING COURT’S ABILITY TO REQUIRE PLAINTIFFS TO SIGN HIPAA MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION FORMS

Jonathan Goodman, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties in both cases designated above are simultaneously involved in an identical discovery issue: whether the Court can require Plaintiffs to sign a HI-PAA1 medical authorization form for the release of medical records from third party healthcare providers because they have placed the physical and/or mental conditions at issue. In fact, the discovery hearings in these two otherwise unrelated cases fortuitously occurred on the very same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klugel v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. James Clayton JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Flannery v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  3. Neira v. GualtieriDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
  4. Silvia V. Maldonado v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  5. State of Arizona v. James Clayton JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API