Legal Opinion

Wanner v. Litvak

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 27, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

179 N.J. Super. 607 (1981)

433 A.2d 445

WILLIAM HOWARD WANNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

KATHLEEN M. LITVAK, FORMERLY KATHLEEN MARIE WANNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 12, 1981.

Decided July 27, 1981.

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

Rocco Ravaschiere argued the cause for appellant (Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys; William T. Koch, Jr., on the brief).

Samuel L. Epstein argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, J.A.D.

This is a matrimonial matter which involves the issue of the obligation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kruvant v. KruvantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Skillman v. SkillmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Barrie v. BarrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Sakovits v. SakovitsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Alford v. Somerset County Welfare BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LORI B. LICHTER VS. BRAD E. LICHTER (FM-13-136-93, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API