Legal Opinion

Franicevich v. Dumas

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1963No. 938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Matthew J. Franicevich and two corporations of which Franicevich was president and for whom he acted, instituted this suit against the defendant for $1,460.-00, $1,300.00 of which represented unpaid charter hire for the lugger Mary Jane, the balance thereof, $160.00, representing repairs to defendant’s vessels. It was stipulated during the trial that the $1,300.00 figure was incorrect due to a mathematical error in counting days and that figure accordingly was reduced to $1,235.00. Hereafter we refer to Franicevich himself, rather than all plaintiffs, as “plaintiff”.

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Noto v. BlascoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Haley v. BadonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Gulf States Finance Corp. v. MosesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Mouton ex rel. Halsted v. NobleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
  5. Thibodeaux v. W. Horace Williams Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Parish of Calcasieu, Calcasieu Par. Pol. J. v. TraigleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Thornton & Brooks, Inc. v. BrooksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API