Legal Opinion

Stiringer v. Toy

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, President :

On April 1,1886, the two firms of Stiringer & Wotring and Toy & Clawges entered into a written agreement, by which, among other matters, they agreed to set aside a certain judgment for $300.00, and costs, recovered by Stiringer & Wot-ring against Toy & Clawges before a justice, and to submit the matters out of which said judgment had arisen “to the arbitrament and award of two arbitrators and an umpire, each party to choose one arbitrator, and the arbitrators so chosen to choose the umpire, and the award of said arbitrators to be entered up as the judgment of the Circuit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Battey v. ButtonNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riley v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. BOARD OF ED., ETC. v. W. Harley Miller, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Clinton Water Ass'n v. Farmers Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Boomer Coal & Coke Co. v. OsentonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API