Legal Opinion

Clark v. Assurance Company of America

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1980No. 60851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

1. “Code Ann. § 81A-156 places the burden on the moving party to show that no material issues of fact exist. The burden of proof can be shifted, however, when a prima facie showing is made that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The opposite party must come forward with rebuttal evidence at that time, or suffer judgment against him.” Meade v. Heimanson, 239 Ga. 177, 180 (236 SE2d 357) (1977).

2. Where the appellee plaintiff files suit against the defendant on open account, and thereafter files a motion for summary judgment supported by the affidavit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meade v. HeimansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. MAXEY-BOSSHARDT LUMBER CO. INC. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Ambrose v. E. F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dixieland Truck Brokers, Inc. v. International Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Griffin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Kinney v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API