Legal Opinion
Falik v. Prince George's Hospital & Medical Center
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 5, 1991No. 12, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This case focuses upon § 37 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Maryland Code (1985 Repl.Vol., 1990 Cum.Supp.), Art. 101. Subsection (a) provides that the employer of a worker who sustains a job-related compensable injury shall promptly provide necessary medical, surgical and other treatment. Subsection (c) provides, in part:
“All fees and other charges for such treatment and services shall be subject to regulation by the [Workmen’s Compensation] Commission, and shall be limited to such charges as prevail in the same community for similar treatment of injured persons of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- County Council v. Investors Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Truitt v. Board of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- C & P TELEPHONE CO. OF MD. v. Director of Finance, City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.