Legal Opinion

Workman v. Marshall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1966No. 38093PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a reduction of the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial in an action for personal injuries tried before a jury.

The minor plaintiff (hereafter referred to as the plaintiff) was struck, while in a marked crosswalk, by an automobile driven by a daughter of the defendants. She suffered minor bruises and contusions, a lumbosacral strain and coccygo-dynia. Her medical expenses totaled $308 and it was predicted by her doctor at the time of trial (2 years after the accident) that she would have future medical expenses of about $50. The medical testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nelson v. MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Partello v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Harvey v. WightWashington Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Adams v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API