Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Warren

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

Whether the appellee has a meritorious cause of action against the appellant, or is endeavoring to perpetrate a gross fraud upon it, is a question upon which it is not improbable that the verdict of a jury, after a fair trial, would be conclusive; but not after such a trial as is shown by this record.

Among the reasons assigned by the appellant on its motion for a new trial, were these:

“ 6. The court erred in its rulings, and each of them, in respect to the kind and character of defendant’s testimony, and as to the mode, manner and…