Poag v. Charlotte Oil & Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., York, November, 1900. Action on account and for damages by J. Edgar Poag against Charlotte Oil and Fertilizer Co. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Mr. C. E. Spencer cites: 59 A. D., 401; 2 McC., 214; 35 A. D., 343; i Allen, 208; 6 Mete., 527; 2 Mete., 374; 2 East., 446; 25 A. D., 214. Mr. J. S. Brice cites: 2 N. & McC., 538; 27 S. €., 376; 17 E. R. A., 545; 12 S. C., 590; 37 L. R. A., 799; 6 E; R. A., 149; 5 Ency., 320, 321; 11 E. R. A., 681.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope. The complaint contains two causes of action, in the first of which the plaintiff alleges the defendant to be indebted, under contract, to the plaintiff the balance of $34, for a rebate on 200 tons of cotton seed hulls at 25 cents per ton, and for 400 empty sacks shipped by plaintiff to defendant at $2 per hundred; and on the second of which, the defendant, by reason of unsound cotton seed hulls shipped by it to plaintiff, damaged the plaintiff $200. Judgmeht for $234 was demanded by plaintiff. The answer of defendant denied any…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bradley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Stevenson v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Bromonia Co. v. Greenwood Drug Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Cooper & Griffin, Inc. v. BridwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.