Legal Opinion

Cape St. Mary Associates v. San Juan County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 2, 2020No. 79333-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CAPE ST. MARY ASSOCIATES, ) NO. 79333-1-I Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION SAN JUAN COUNTY, ) ) Respondent. ) FILED: March 2, 2020 LEACH, J. — Cape St. Mary Associates (CSMA) challenges a San Juan County Hearing Examiner’s decision that any application to subdivide or vacate the Ranch Tract of the plat Cape St. Mary Estates had to be signed by all of the lot owners in the subdivision. Because the Cape St. Mary plat unambiguously incorporated a restrictive covenant requiring that the Ranch Tract be used only for “primarily…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Scott Paper Co. v. City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API