Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Queree

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 23, 1960No. 19163PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sutton.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants below and will be referred to herein as Riveras; defendant in error was plaintiff and will be referred to as Queree.

Queree owns Lot 4, Block 29, Hager’s Addition to Highland, City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, in fee simple. She had lived on the premises for 68 years up to the date of trial. Riveras own Lots 26 and 27, Re-subdivision of Lots 19 to 24, inclusive, of Block 29, Hager’s Addition, which they purchased in 1956. The rear of Queree’s property is opposite a portion of Riveras’ property, the two parcels…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoff v. Girdler CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cox v. Pearl Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Westland Nursing Home, Inc. v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Wright v. Horse Creek RanchesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Matoush v. LovingoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. Clinger v. HartshornColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API